<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
                    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
                    xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
                    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
                    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" >
    <channel>
        <title>pair.com (pair.com) customer and user reviews over RSS/ATOM feed</title>
        <description>pair.com RSS feed customers and users reviews at web-hosting-top.com</description>
        <link>http://www.web-hosting-top.com/reviews/pair.com</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.web-hosting-top.com/rss.reviews/pair.com" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 19:35:24 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        <copyright>(c) 2002 - 2012 http://www.web-hosting-top.com/</copyright>
        <pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 07:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
        <category>Web Hosting Reviews</category>
        <item>
            <title>pair.com reviewed by Steve Kinney ( admin@p... ) , Rating 10 out of 10</title>
            <link>http://www.web-hosting-top.com/reviews/pair.com/12424</link>
            <description><![CDATA[I have used pair.com for about 8 years, to host static sites including commercial clients with very high bandwidth requirements.  I have never seen downtime or slow content delivery, and have never seen a problem with high volumes of e-mail.  I have been consistently impressed with the quality of their tech support, on those rare occasions I have needed questions answered.  <br />
<br />
I am not in a position to comment on complaints re the performance of Wordpress on Pair servers.  Pair Networks is a ...]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:38:34 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink ="true" >http://www.web-hosting-top.com/reviews/pair.com/12424</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>pair.com reviewed by beth ( beth.nicol@g... ) , Rating 9 out of 10</title>
            <link>http://www.web-hosting-top.com/reviews/pair.com/7440</link>
            <description><![CDATA[I would have rated pair as 10's until I started getting the "why don't you consider moving all of your sites to MovableType" when they disabled them because of high load (these sites are Wordpress and MediaWiki); This has been mostly in the last month (October 2009).<br />
<br />
Other than that, I have had very good experiences with Pair and it's Support.]]></description>
            <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:48:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink ="true" >http://www.web-hosting-top.com/reviews/pair.com/7440</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>pair.com reviewed by Mike Ross ( Squeevox@m... ) , Rating 1 out of 10</title>
            <link>http://www.web-hosting-top.com/reviews/pair.com/7238</link>
            <description><![CDATA[Pair doesn't read the totality of support messages to them leading to the undoing of previous fixes.<br />
Some of their people are real good but their working fixes get undone by the next guy when you have another query.<br />
They of course assume that I know what they are talking about and give me instructions for a geek instead of consumer.<br />
After over a year of over usage charges they finally told me that they gave me two mailboxes which are filled with spam. I never asked for or needed them; my e ...]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 06:28:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink ="true" >http://www.web-hosting-top.com/reviews/pair.com/7238</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>pair.com reviewed by G W ( strangest@c... ) , Rating 2 out of 10</title>
            <link>http://www.web-hosting-top.com/reviews/pair.com/5265</link>
            <description><![CDATA[I actually switch my clients away from Pair and Pair Networks very cheaply, because it makes maintenance of their site easier in the long run. Pair shared hosting is horrible at best, with no access to log files, .htaccess files scattered everywhere, and seriously botched upgrades which brought our site down for days. <br />
We kept the SSL keys purchased under Pair Networks, and wrote to them a month before they were scheduled to expire, asking to renew only the SSL keys. <br />
We assumed all was good ...]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:32:24 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink ="true" >http://www.web-hosting-top.com/reviews/pair.com/5265</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>pair.com reviewed by Harry Davis ( hmcl1@y... ) , Rating 10 out of 10</title>
            <link>http://www.web-hosting-top.com/reviews/pair.com/4875</link>
            <description><![CDATA[Customer support is exemplary; all emails arrive virtually at the same moment; never any problems. Excellent host, pair.com]]></description>
            <pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 03:48:01 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink ="true" >http://www.web-hosting-top.com/reviews/pair.com/4875</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>pair.com reviewed by vlad ( -no email- ) , Rating 10 out of 10</title>
            <link>http://www.web-hosting-top.com/reviews/pair.com/3431</link>
            <description><![CDATA[very reliable, quick response to email requests/questions.  never needed customer service.  price is high for the features offered but the reliability of the service makes it worth it.  never had a delayed email in more than 6 years.]]></description>
            <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:21:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink ="true" >http://www.web-hosting-top.com/reviews/pair.com/3431</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>pair.com reviewed by Alex ( alxram@g... ) , Rating 1 out of 10</title>
            <link>http://www.web-hosting-top.com/reviews/pair.com/2785</link>
            <description><![CDATA[If you want to host any type of blog or database driven website (like Wordpress) I don't recommend pair. The minute you start getting significant traffic (even on a high-volume account) they'll disable your site without warning. Then they'll act like it's your fault for using Wordpress, and they won't re-enable your site until the traffic goes down. Their 'high volume' accounts are only good for static html based websites.]]></description>
            <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 06:12:19 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink ="true" >http://www.web-hosting-top.com/reviews/pair.com/2785</guid>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
